Comments on: Wikipedia editing as teaching tool http://www.stoa.org/archives/600 Serving news, projects, and links for digital classicists everywhere. Wed, 08 May 2013 16:09:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Gabriel Bodard http://www.stoa.org/archives/600/comment-page-1#comment-69385 Gabriel Bodard Tue, 01 May 2007 11:05:51 +0000 http://www.stoa.org/?p=600#comment-69385 A good point you raise there. On the other hand I suppose it could be argued that part of the task of evaluating a Wikipedia page is to make sure that it is appropriate, that is does not incorporate copyrighted material, that it is sufficiently “neutral point of view” etc. Students should be alerted to this both when authoring and when editing others’ pages. (Let them experience the joys of searching the web to check for plagiarism… it may be eye-opening for them to realise how easy it is to catch.)

]]> By: Giovanni Milani http://www.stoa.org/archives/600/comment-page-1#comment-69326 Giovanni Milani Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:20:04 +0000 http://www.stoa.org/?p=600#comment-69326 Hi – I’m not your everyday accademic, simply very interested in ancient rome to the point that I’ve collected a great deal of material and published it on someone else’s site (my wife’s). Interestingly the material (including antique prints from books I’ve collected through the years) had been crawled by the search engines and I now have hundreds if not thousands of students lifting material – I have no problem with that of course as the whole objective is putting it there for others to partake, but I just wonder whether a very good proportion of your students might not be extremely tempted to pick up from one side to paste in the other, especially as the objective of their work might be to get something posted on wikipedia rather than the original research per se.

Perhaps it’s just semantics but it might be better to split the task into two or even three parts: firstly do “old style” research which has to be handed in for grading and then afterwards (part 2 of the project) tell them to make something of their work by publishing it (in Wikipedia) and following it up….. Like becoming parent of something you’ve created. Or even better, do step 1, grade it and then tell them to fix it for step 2, then publish and then after a couple of months review with the Wikipedia responses and comments. They’ll see their baby grow and take pride. Just a thought.

]]> By: Simon Mahony http://www.stoa.org/archives/600/comment-page-1#comment-62174 Simon Mahony Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:28:03 +0000 http://www.stoa.org/?p=600#comment-62174 As above – a cool idea and one that I wish I were able to implement!

]]>