<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ImaNote &#8211; Image and Map Annotation Notebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoa.org/archives/608/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoa.org/archives/608</link>
	<description>Serving news, projects, and links for digital classicists everywhere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Cytotec</title>
		<link>http://www.stoa.org/archives/608/comment-page-1#comment-132853</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Cytotec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoa.org/?p=608#comment-132853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Sorry for the late reply… 

It is the Open Source aspect that we were seeking to address. This is of special significance for the cultural heritage institutions that we have worked with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Sorry for the late reply… </p>
<p>It is the Open Source aspect that we were seeking to address. This is of special significance for the cultural heritage institutions that we have worked with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily</title>
		<link>http://www.stoa.org/archives/608/comment-page-1#comment-78638</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoa.org/?p=608#comment-78638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Sorry for the late reply... 

It is the Open Source aspect that we were seeking to address. This is of special significance for the cultural heritage institutions that we have worked with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Sorry for the late reply&#8230; </p>
<p>It is the Open Source aspect that we were seeking to address. This is of special significance for the cultural heritage institutions that we have worked with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Bodard</title>
		<link>http://www.stoa.org/archives/608/comment-page-1#comment-64327</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Bodard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 09:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoa.org/?p=608#comment-64327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, even assuming that this tool adds nothing by way of fuctionality to existing technologies such as those offered by Facebook et al., the fact that this tool is Open Source is a huge step forward. This means that (a) it is available for you and me to use on our own projects, without tying ourselves to proprietary technology that we would have to continue paying for in the future, and (b) perhaps equally importantly, the tool can be built on and improved by all sorts of programmers who find it useful, and *redistributed* to the original community in its improved state.

If the Facebook interface is proprietary and closed code, as I imagine it would be, then the community has no choice but to reinvent the wheel if they want a tool that can be used in this way. Your suggestions about using Ajax and other mechanisms to improve the technology are well-taken. I hope you and others get involved to help implement this. (You can do so at their &lt;a href=&quot;http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/imanote/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Savannah repository&lt;/a&gt;.)
(I do not speak for the ImaNote creators, by the way, and I have not used the tool.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, even assuming that this tool adds nothing by way of fuctionality to existing technologies such as those offered by Facebook et al., the fact that this tool is Open Source is a huge step forward. This means that (a) it is available for you and me to use on our own projects, without tying ourselves to proprietary technology that we would have to continue paying for in the future, and (b) perhaps equally importantly, the tool can be built on and improved by all sorts of programmers who find it useful, and *redistributed* to the original community in its improved state.</p>
<p>If the Facebook interface is proprietary and closed code, as I imagine it would be, then the community has no choice but to reinvent the wheel if they want a tool that can be used in this way. Your suggestions about using Ajax and other mechanisms to improve the technology are well-taken. I hope you and others get involved to help implement this. (You can do so at their <a href="http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/imanote/" rel="nofollow">Savannah repository</a>.)<br />
(I do not speak for the ImaNote creators, by the way, and I have not used the tool.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No one.</title>
		<link>http://www.stoa.org/archives/608/comment-page-1#comment-63719</link>
		<dc:creator>No one.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoa.org/?p=608#comment-63719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks like a reinvention of the wheel: Facebook has allowed users collaboratively to create such &quot;maps,&quot; or create labels associated with parts of images, for some time now.  The expectation on Facebook is that users will use the tool to highlight their own and friends&#039; faces in photographs and link them to the friends&#039; Facebook accounts.  Later, users interested in a particular face in a photograph can reach that person&#039;s account and read about them (or stalk them).  It looks like ImaNote just took the same idea and extended the concept beyond social networking, but without improving the technology behind the idea: reinventing the wheel.

The demo imanote account doesn&#039;t seem all that different, except that a request to zoom required a page reload rather than just an xmlhttprequest call.  There seem to be a number of places in which ajax would help make this feel more professional and less academic/amateur.  The demo site&#039;s selector relies on a drop-down box, not an image gallery; Facebook has a definite advantage in ease of selecting images.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a reinvention of the wheel: Facebook has allowed users collaboratively to create such &#8220;maps,&#8221; or create labels associated with parts of images, for some time now.  The expectation on Facebook is that users will use the tool to highlight their own and friends&#8217; faces in photographs and link them to the friends&#8217; Facebook accounts.  Later, users interested in a particular face in a photograph can reach that person&#8217;s account and read about them (or stalk them).  It looks like ImaNote just took the same idea and extended the concept beyond social networking, but without improving the technology behind the idea: reinventing the wheel.</p>
<p>The demo imanote account doesn&#8217;t seem all that different, except that a request to zoom required a page reload rather than just an xmlhttprequest call.  There seem to be a number of places in which ajax would help make this feel more professional and less academic/amateur.  The demo site&#8217;s selector relies on a drop-down box, not an image gallery; Facebook has a definite advantage in ease of selecting images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
