<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rieger, Preservation in the Age of Large-Scale Digitization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoa.org/archives/779/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoa.org/archives/779</link>
	<description>Serving news, projects, and links for digital classicists everywhere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dot Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.stoa.org/archives/779/comment-page-1#comment-107562</link>
		<dc:creator>Dot Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoa.org/?p=779#comment-107562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The more copies of our cultural artefacts that exist, in different formats, contexts, and versions, the more likely we are to retain some of our civilisation after the next cataclysm.&quot;

That&#039;s the aim of LOCKSS - Lots of Copies Keeps Stuff Safe - to encourage libraries to take part in distributed preservation of digital works (http://www.lockss.org/lockss/Home). I don&#039;t know much about their software (&quot;open source, peer-to-peer, decentralized digital preservation infrastructure&quot;) but the idea is a sound one. Points to the importance of open access, too - the more copies there are, the more likely that a copy will be available into the future. Keeping your digital data locked up is not a sound strategy for long-term preservation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The more copies of our cultural artefacts that exist, in different formats, contexts, and versions, the more likely we are to retain some of our civilisation after the next cataclysm.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the aim of LOCKSS &#8211; Lots of Copies Keeps Stuff Safe &#8211; to encourage libraries to take part in distributed preservation of digital works (<a href="http://www.lockss.org/lockss/Home" rel="nofollow">http://www.lockss.org/lockss/Home</a>). I don&#8217;t know much about their software (&#8220;open source, peer-to-peer, decentralized digital preservation infrastructure&#8221;) but the idea is a sound one. Points to the importance of open access, too &#8211; the more copies there are, the more likely that a copy will be available into the future. Keeping your digital data locked up is not a sound strategy for long-term preservation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
