Identification of abbreviations not understood by the editor

xml version || id: abbreviationsnotunderstood|| traditional typographic representation | regular expression test | epidoc appearance with standard xslt | notes | questions and issues | responsibility for this section | cvs information || post a comment || test this page

Release or development version: r-5

Implementation of the guidance in this section is required for leiden conformance.

Traditional typographic representation

Panciera , p.17:
1. a(- - -)
2. Not addressed
3. Not addressed

EpiDoc Encoding

<abbr>a</abbr>
<abbr>pr</abbr>
<abbr>p</abbr> <abbr>r</abbr>

EpiDoc appearance with standard XSLT

a(- - -)
pr(- - -)
p(- - -) r(- - -)

Notes

Examples 2. and 3. indicate the difference between a group of letters representing a single abbreviated word, and an abbreviated phrase or formula. If an abbreviation is not understood and its nature as single word or phrase cannot be determined, the procedure for uncertainty should be followed.

Questions and issues

None

Responsibility for this section

author: Tom Elliott
author: Gabriel Bodard
author: John Bodel

CVS Information

Revision number: $Revision: 1.12 $

Revision name (if any): $Name: r-5 $

Revision date: $Date: 2006/10/30 12:05:35 $

Revision committed by: $Author: paregorios $