Editorial supplement for characters wholly lost
leiden
Traditional typographic representation
<xref href="bibliography.xml#panciera" >Panciera</xref>, p.18:
iug[er]anot addressednot addressednot addressedOther conventions:n/a[V?]III or [V(?)]III or [?V]IIIτ[οὺς · · ·]τὸ[ν Διο]γένην
Regular Expression Test
blah
EpiDoc appearance with standard XSLT
iugeraVIIIτοὺςτὸνΔιογένην
Notes
Example 2 is the case of a restoration flagged as uncertain by the editor. Local preferences as to placement of the question mark may vary: the standard XSLTs replicate the most common practice, but this is easily customised by individual projects.Examples 3 and 4 are to demonstrate standard XSLT handling of partially restored lacunae, and supplements divided by embedded markup, respectively. This handling has been designed not to interfere with standard markup if these rules are not required.
Questions and issues
none
TEI P4 links
supplied18.2.3 Damage, Illegibility, and Supplied Text
Responsibility for this section
authorTom ElliottauthorGabriel Bodard