<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE div SYSTEM "../dtd/tei-epidoc.dtd">
<!-- Start CVS information: do not remove -->
<!-- $Header: /cvsroot/epidoc/guidelines/src/incorrectlyexecuted.xml,v 1.6 2006/03/15 18:42:13 paregorios Exp $ -->
<!-- End CVS information: do not remove -->

<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" id="incorrectlyexecuted" lang="en">
   <head>Letters incorrectly executed in the text, which the editor corrects</head>
   <div id="incorrectlyexecuted-typographic" type="gl-typographic">
      <head>Traditional typographic representation</head>
      <list type="unordered">
         <item><bibl><title level="a" type="abbreviated"><xref href="bibliography.xml#seg">SEG</xref></title></bibl>, <bibl><title level="a" type="abbreviated"><xref href="bibliography.xml#poxy">POxy</xref></title></bibl>
            <list type="ordered">
               <item>Valeria&lt;n&gt;us</item>
            </list></item>
      </list>
   </div>
   <div id="incorrectlyexecuted-encoding" type="gl-encoding">
      <head>EpiDoc encodings</head>
      <list type="ordered">
         <item>Valeria <tag>sic corr="n"</tag>m <tag>/sic</tag>us</item>
         <item>Valeria <tag>corr sic="m"</tag>n <tag>/sic</tag>us</item>
      </list>
      <p>Note: The two examples shown are semantically equivalent and may be interchanged as necessary.</p>
   </div>
   <div id="incorrectlyexecuted-edition" lang="lat" type="gl-edition">
      <head lang="en">EpiDoc appearance with standard XSLT</head>
      <list type="ordered">
         <item>Valeria <sic corr="n">m</sic>us</item>
         <item>Valeria <corr sic="m">n</corr>us</item>
      </list>
   </div>
   <div id="incorrectlyexecuted-notes" type="gl-notes">
      <head>Notes</head>
      <list type="unordered">
         <item>Wiki comment from <persName>G. Bodard</persName> ( <date>30 March 2005</date>): The issue of incorrectly written characters is very similar in principle to that of a pair of substituted letters; metathesis is in fact only one example of this kind of correction. Should we distinguish betwene the two? Do Panciera's half-brackets also work for correction of C to G, e.g.?</item>
      </list>
   </div>
   <div id="incorrectlyexecuted-tei-p4links" type="gl-tei-p4links">
      <head>TEI P4 links</head>
      <list>
         <item><xref href="http://www.tei-c.org/P4X/ref-SIC.html"><tag>sic</tag></xref></item>
         <item><xref href="http://www.tei-c.org/P4X/CO.html#COEDCOR">6.5.1 Correction of Apparent Errors</xref></item>
         <item><xref href="http://www.tei-c.org/P4X/PH.html#PHCC">18.1.3 Correction and Conjecture</xref></item>
      </list>
   </div>
   <div id="incorrectlyexecuted-responsibility" type="gl-responsibility">
      <head>Responsibility for this section</head>
      <listBibl>
         <bibl><respStmt><resp>author</resp><name>Gabriel Bodard</name></respStmt></bibl>
         <bibl><respStmt><resp>XML conversion</resp><name>Tom Elliott</name></respStmt></bibl>
      </listBibl>
   </div>
   <div id="incorrectlyexecuted-cvs" type="gl-cvs">
      <head><abbr expan="Concurrent Versioning System">CVS</abbr> Information</head>
      <p id="incorrectlyexecuted-cvs-revision-number">Revision number: <seg n="cvs-revision-number">$Revision: 1.6 $</seg></p>
      <p id="incorrectlyexecuted-cvs-revision-name">Revision name (if any): <seg n="cvs-revision-name">$Name: sandstorm $</seg></p>
      <p id="incorrectlyexecuted-cvs-revision-date">Revision date: <seg n="cvs-revision-date">$Date: 2006/03/15 18:42:13 $</seg></p>
      <p id="incorrectlyexecuted-cvs-revision-author">Revision committed by: <seg n="cvs-revision-author">$Author: paregorios $</seg></p>
   </div>
</div>

