<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE div SYSTEM "../dtd/tei-epidoc.dtd">
<!-- Start CVS information: do not remove -->
<!-- $Header: /cvsroot/epidoc/guidelines/src/Attic/interpuncts.xml,v 1.1.2.3 2006/03/23 12:01:22 gabrielbodard Exp $ -->
<!-- End CVS information: do not remove -->

<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" id="interpuncts">
   <head>Interpuncts</head>
   <p>Dohnicht, pp. 4-5 discusses sigla for interpuncts and various associated issues; Panciera does not address. There was much disagreement
       at the first epidoc workshop about how and whether interpuncts should be encoded. We need to have option(s) - what should they be?</p>
    <p>Inter-word and inter-syllabic punction must both be addressed - Dohnicht makes the semantic distinction, but uses the same symbol (a hollow middle dot)</p>
   <div id="interpuncts-cvs" type="gl-cvs">
      <head><abbr expan="Concurrent Versioning System">CVS</abbr> Information</head>
      <p id="interpuncts-cvs-revision-number">Revision number: <seg n="cvs-revision-number">$Revision: 1.1.2.3 $</seg></p>
      <p id="interpuncts-cvs-revision-name">Revision name (if any): <seg n="cvs-revision-name">$Name: sandstorm $</seg></p>
      <p id="interpuncts-cvs-revision-date">Revision date: <seg n="cvs-revision-date">$Date: 2006/03/23 12:01:22 $</seg></p>
      <p id="interpuncts-cvs-revision-author">Revision committed by: <seg n="cvs-revision-author">$Author: gabrielbodard $</seg></p>
   </div>
   
</div>

