Dēmos · Classical Athenian Democracy · a Stoa Publication
[ link colors: Demos | External Source | Citation to Evidence| Word Tools ]
→ Foreign Policy: Sending Embassies.
Foreign Policy: Receiving Ambassadors.
Foreign Policy: General Issues.
Complaints about Religious Matters.
Disorderly Conduct, Corruption, and Manipulation.
The Dangers of Bad Government.
—
—
Christopher W. Blackwell, edition of March 26, 2003
page 13 of 23
Plot on a Map
Athens.
The Assembly was responsible for the general conduct of Athens’ public business, which included sending embassies to conduct business with other states.
Read about the evidence
Aristotle (Aristot. Ath. Pol.).
Demosthenes (Dem. 19).
Demosthenes (Dem. 18).
Aeschines (Aeschin. 2).
Plot on a Map
Macedon.
Persia.
Rhamnus.
Aristotle, after listing the two special meetings of the Assembly in each prytany, says that the remaining two meetings were reserved for “all other business” (
Read about the evidence
Aeschines (Aeschin. 3).
Plot on a Map
Themopylae.
Delphi.
Certain embassies were recurring, such as the Hieronomon (
Read about the evidence
Aeschines (Aeschin. 2).
Apollodorus (Dem. 53).
Demosthenes (Dem. 19).
Demosthenes (Dem. 12).
Plot on a Map
Megara.
Eleusis.
The Assembly could appoint citizens to serve on embassies, but a citizen could excuse himself by swearing an oath (
Read about the evidence
Aeschines (Aeschin. 3).
Aeschines (Aeschin. 2).
Demosthenes (Dem. 19).
Aristophanes (Aristoph. Ach.).
Plot on a Map
Persia.
Once an embassy, dispatched by the Assembly, completed its mission, it was to report to the Assembly (Aeschin. 3.125, Aeschin. 2.47). These reports were important: Aeschines mentions a motion to hold a meeting of the Assembly on a sacred day, so that the Assembly could hear an embassy’s report as quickly as possible (Aeschin. 3.67). The Assembly could not make foreign policy decisions until they had heard from their returning ambassadors, and we hear of at least one occasion when the business of several cities, which were engaged in multi-lateral negotiations, came to a standstill until an Athenian embassy reported to the Athenian assembly (Aeschin. 2.60). Demosthenes accuses an embassy, which he claims reported only to the Council, of failing in its duty by not reporting immediately to the Assembly (Dem. 19.19); and the responsibility went in both directions, since Aeschines suggests that a returning had a right to the opportunity to report to the Assembly (Aeschin. 2.121). If the Assembly reacted favorably to the report, it could pass a vote of thanks to the ambassadors and treat them to a meal at public expense (Aeschin. 2.53). But not all reports were so well received, such as that of Epicrates, who was subject to impeachment and condemned to death for mishandling an embassy (Dem. 19.276). There is also a parody of an embassy’s report in Aristophanes’ Acharnians, during which a character complains that an embassy to Persia wasted the city’s money (Aristoph. Ach. 60); the jokes here may reflect a common topic of discussion in the Assembly when embassies reported their activities.
page 13 of 23